When teachers face a premium for lessons on race

And now, in the latest effort to make teaching as unappealing a profession as possible, the New Hampshire Chapter of Moms for Liberty offered $ 500 to anyone who “successfully catches a public school teacher” breaking a new law prohibiting the teaching of critical race theory. This initiative, known to its authors as “CRT Bounty’s” [sic], directs readers to the state’s Department of Education website, which now includes a section for filing teacher complaints.


No, not teachers’ complaints about the seriousness of their working conditions. This bonus is awarded to people who report teachers suspected of teaching that racism exists and is entrenched in public institutions.

They haven’t yet embarked on a bounty program for people who don’t know how to form a plural name ending in “y”.

Even without the premium, the New Hampshire Board of Education has the power to punish teachers who violate the rule that prohibits “teaching children that they are inferior, racist, sexist or oppressive because of their race, gender or other characteristics”. Yes, that is, they are white. If they are not, the absence of such teaching confirms to them that they are considered inferior and that no one in power cares what they think.

The critical theory of race is, as Mike Pence told us, “state sanctioned racism”. I suspect that few of his critics could pass a simple test of comprehension of his principles, if the opponents I have seen represent the critical population. CRT is such a frightening specter that it must be banned, and its practitioners must be punished, if they can be found. And we’ve got $ 500 a piece for you if you can get them out.

The conservative Granite Grok website describes teachers who plan to defy the ban as “dangerous human beings, who have simmered for so long in this poisonous ideology that many of them have become self-contradictory fanatics.” People who in no way should have access to children, and certainly not for the purpose of shaping their intellect if you can even call it that.

What kinds of radical, far-left, America-hating and guilt-inducing white texts could serve as a springboard for such state-sanctioned racism and the oppression of white students? Let’s take a look at one and see.

The American Constitution is often studied in schools. In georgia, “Public Law 108-447 requires the designation of Constitution Day and Citizenship Day on September 17 of each year. The purpose of Constitution Day and Citizenship Day is to commemorate the formation and signing, on September 17, 1787, of the Constitution and to recognize all those who, by their majority or their naturalization, have become citizens.

Certainly, a text establishing the basis of the legal and governmental systems of the United States would not be controversial. And just as surely, teaching it just might attract bounty hunters to your classroom.

Say a professor of social studies in Georgia or American literature hopes to honor Public Law 108-447 by teaching the Constitution in mid-September. In accordance with Article I, Section 2, of the Constitution of the United States, “the representatives and direct taxes are distributed among the various states which may be included in this Union, according to their respective number, which is determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those connected with service for a period of years, and excluding untaxed Indians, three-fifths of all other persons. “

These unnamed “other persons” were Black slaves, a class of people in each state of the Union circa 1787. After the Civil War, this law was revised in section 2 of the 14th Amendment to remove provision 3/5. “Indians”? The natives did not acquire citizenship of the nation established on the lands they had occupied for 12,000 years until 1924. They were considered 0/5 of a person until the year of birth. my father.

In both versions of the law, the rules only applied to men. Women had little access to the right to own property, to vote, to hold office and to have other “natural rights” assumed to be the exclusive province of men.

Article 4, section 2 of the original Constitution further required that escaped slaves be returned to their owners; and Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 prevented Congress from banning slavery until 1808.

Let’s say a teacher assigns the Constitution to read and asks: What questions do you have about the Constitution? And let’s say a child says: Why were black people 60% human, and Indians were not considered people at all?

Then imagine a kid across the room seeing Critical Race Theory at work and denouncing the teacher for collecting that $ 500 bounty and making sure the teacher is properly punished. Does that sound like a profession you would like to stay or even enter?

CRT is all about institutional racism, the ways in which racism is integrated into the system of governance and social life. Racism is often so entrenched in social institutions that it is difficult to see it, at least for those who benefit from it. If you find a talking fish and ask it if it lives in water, it might say, “Water? What is that?”

Water comes up in another subject that could be covered in a science class. Some people’s water is cleaner than others, and some schools have brown flowing water. I can imagine a kid in a school of brown water wondering: Why is my school so unsanitary? A CRT bounty hunter could pocket a nice reward for helping punish the teacher for allowing a question leading to a response saturated in critical breed theory.

In this case, the fish is in unsanitary water, which makes it easier to see, at least for fish of a different color. People saturated with their own beliefs find it difficult to see how the environment is anchored in their ideology. The New Hampshire CRT Bounty program will ensure that the discriminatory structures entrenched in American society from the beginning remain invisible and impervious to attention.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see a CRT bounty hunter club spring up in Georgia, where school board meetings have become places where riot gear is now properly dressed. If you thought that a serious shortage of teachers is imminent due to poor working conditions, wait and see the teaching profession when an activist public concerned with preserving their own hierarchy of statutes finally breaks teachers’ backs with a threat of too much.

Source link

Check Also

Senate Bill 35 makes communities vulnerable

Senate Bill 35 removes authority over Santa Cruz development from the city government and the …